A 10-section cross-state market analysis covering state comparison charts, compliance landscape, 30-county rankings across all selected states, Top 50 deployment targets, financial health by market, and an auto-generated deployment strategy narrative — for 2 or more states in one report.
For organizations operating or deploying across multiple states, the critical question isn't "what's the best opportunity in Texas?" — it's "given Texas, Florida, and Arizona, where should I deploy first, and how do I prioritize across all three?" That's a cross-state question that requires a cross-state answer.
Top 50 deployment targets ranked across all selected states in a single table — not 25 targets per state that you have to manually reconcile. Cross-state ranking surfaces the single best opportunity regardless of which state it's in.
30 counties across all selected states ranked in a unified table. Identify whether the best market in Florida outranks the best market in Texas before committing BD resources to a geography.
An auto-generated strategy section that identifies highest urgency state, strongest revenue market, best existing agency market, and top county recommendation — written as a deployment memo, not a data table.
| Who | The problem they bring to this report | How they use it |
|---|---|---|
| Regional Staffing Agency | Operating in 3–5 states and needs to prioritize which markets get BD headcount, which get a new recruiter, and which to enter next. Can't justify separate state reports for each market every quarter. | Run one report covering all current operating states. Cross-state county rankings show which markets to grow vs. hold. Top 50 target list gives the quarterly BD priority list. Deployment strategy narrative becomes the regional planning doc. |
| National Staffing Agency VP | Evaluating 3–4 new state markets for regional office expansion. Needs side-by-side comparison before recommending a budget allocation to the C-suite. | State Comparison section shows key metrics side by side. Financial Health by Market shows whether revenue capacity in each state can support agency rates. The auto-generated narrative frames the recommendation in plain language. |
| PE Fund — Multi-State Mandate | Sourcing nursing home acquisitions across a 3-state footprint. Needs a unified target pipeline rather than three separate state acquisition reports to manually cross-reference. | Top 50 Deployment Targets table gives a cross-state ranked pipeline. County Market Rankings show geographic concentration of opportunity. Financial Health by Market shows which state has the most favorable operating economics. |
| Multi-State Operator | Benchmarking operations across multiple states or evaluating bolt-on acquisitions adjacent to existing facilities. Needs a market-level view of each operating state for board reporting. | State Comparison section provides the board-level state-vs-state performance summary. Compliance Landscape shows regulatory risk differential between operating markets. County rankings identify expansion opportunities within each state footprint. |
Ten sections covering every dimension of a multi-state market analysis — from high-level state comparison down to individual facility targets, with cross-state financial health and an auto-written strategy narrative.
Hero header showing all selected state names, four cross-state stat boxes (total facilities, combined beds, average star rating, overall compliance rate), and a compliance banner vs. national benchmark.
Sets the cross-state scope and gives a single-number compliance health signal before any state-by-state breakdown.
Side-by-side bar charts for non-compliance rate and contract dependency across all selected states, plus a comparison table with key metrics per state: facility count, average star rating, compliance rate, Medicaid %, private pay %, contract staffing %.
The state comparison is the report's primary decision-making section — it answers "which state is most attractive?" before any county or facility analysis.
Four compliance status cards (COMPLIANT / AT_RISK / NON_COMPLIANT / CRITICAL counts across all states combined), compliance trend chart vs. national average, and per-state compliance breakdown.
Combined compliance posture across all selected states shows overall portfolio risk — relevant for PE buyers assessing total regulatory exposure and operators benchmarking their market environments.
Top 30 counties across all selected states ranked in a unified table with private pay %, contract staffing %, staffing stability score, facility count, and beds. Counties from all states compete for ranking position in the same table.
Cross-state county ranking is the most powerful section for deployment planning — it shows whether Miami-Dade outranks Harris County or whether a mid-sized Arizona county beats both, in one sortable view.
Scatter plot of all facilities across all selected states, with composite score on X-axis and deployment attractiveness on Y-axis. Ranked table of top 50 targets with CCN, name, state, county, star rating, staffing gap, contract %, and payer mix. Sample blurs facility rows 11–50.
50 targets across multiple states in one ranked table — this is the deliverable that justifies the report's price. No manual reconciliation of separate state reports required.
Auto-generated narrative identifying: highest urgency state, state with the strongest existing agency market, state with the strongest revenue capacity, and the single top county recommendation with rationale.
The narrative section turns data into a recommendation. It's written as a deployment memo — usable directly in internal planning documents, board presentations, or pitch materials without reformatting.
Cross-state financial comparison table from HCRIS cost reports: average facility revenue, average operating margin, revenue per patient day, cost per patient day, unprofitable facility count and percentage — one row per state.
Financial health differentials between states are often larger than expected. A state with high compliance risk may have above-average operating margins — or vice versa. This section surfaces those counterintuitive patterns before deployment decisions are made.
Contract Dependency cross-state comparison, Payer Mix Intelligence per state, and full Methodology section with data source table, composite score formula, and data vintage box for all six layers.
Contract dependency and payer mix per state round out the picture — showing both the labor market conditions and revenue quality in each geography before committing to a deployment plan.
The sample report (TX/FL/CA) shows all 10 sections with full analytical depth. All state names are replaced with generic placeholders. Facility rows 11–50 in the Top 50 table are anonymized. County names, city names, and state codes are replaced throughout. All charts and county-level tables are fully visible.
Most reports give you data and leave the interpretation to you. The Deployment Strategy Insights section goes one step further — it reads the cross-state data and generates a plain-language recommendation that identifies the highest-urgency market, the best existing agency market, the state with the strongest revenue capacity, and the single top county to prioritize. It's not a replacement for judgment, but it's the starting point that saves two hours of interpretation work before your planning meeting.
All data aggregated from facility-level federal records across all selected states. The generator fetches data per state and combines results to ensure diversity across geographies — no single state dominates the combined rankings.
The report requires a minimum of 2 states and is optimized for 2–5 states. You can include more, though reports spanning more than 5 states can become very large and the cross-state comparison sections become harder to read. For portfolios spanning more than 5 states, we recommend running multiple reports covering geographic clusters.
Two separate state reports give you two separate Top 25 lists, two separate county rankings, and two separate sets of charts — which you then have to manually cross-reference to make deployment decisions. The Multi-State Deployment Report gives you one unified Top 50 list, one cross-state county ranking, a side-by-side state comparison, financial health by market, and an auto-generated strategy narrative. The $200 premium buys the cross-state synthesis, not just more data.
Yes — you select the states at purchase time. Any combination of U.S. states is supported. The sample report covers Texas, Florida, and California as an example of a high-volume multi-state configuration.
The State Market Intelligence Report ($299) covers a single state in 9 sections with full depth — including all counties, all staffing data, and the Top 25 facilities for that state. The Multi-State Deployment Report ($499) covers 2+ states in cross-state view — with 30 counties total across all states, Top 50 targets combined, and the state comparison and deployment strategy sections that a single-state report can't provide. Use State Market for deep single-state analysis; use Multi-State Deployment for cross-state planning.
Select 2 or more target states to generate your report. The sample covers Texas, Florida, and California — view it to see the full cross-state analysis before purchasing.
Live facility-level screening, multi-state filtering, and on-demand report generation billed in credits. Built for analysts running repeat diligence workflows.
14,710 SNFs • 12,251 home health agencies • 14.5M staffing records • 50 states
